Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 899
Filter
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 255, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uterine rupture in pregnant women can lead to serious adverse outcomes. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with complete uterine rupture. METHODS: Data from 33 cases of surgically confirmed complete uterine rupture at Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 31,555 pregnant women delivered in our hospital during the study period. Of these, approximately 1‰ (n = 33) had complete uterine rupture. The average gestational age at complete uterine rupture was 31+4 weeks (13+1-40+3 weeks), and the average bleeding volume was 1896.97 ml (200-6000 ml). Twenty-six patients (78.79%) had undergone more than two deliveries. Twenty-five women (75.76%) experienced uterine rupture after a cesarean section, two (6.06%) after fallopian tube surgery, one (3.03%) after laparoscopic cervical cerclage, and one (3.03%) after wedge resection of the uterine horn, and Fifteen women (45.45%) presented with uterine rupture at the original cesarean section incision scar. Thirteen patients (39.39%) were transferred to our hospital after their initial diagnosis. Seven patients (21.21%) had no obvious symptoms, and only four patients (12.12%) had typical persistent lower abdominal pain. There were 13 cases (39.39%, including eight cases ≥ 28 weeks old) of fetal death in utero and two cases (6.06%, both full term) of severe neonatal asphyxia. The rates of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy were 66.67%, 63.64%, and 21.21%. Maternal death occurred in one case (3.03%). CONCLUSIONS: The site of the uterine rupture was random, and was often located at the weakest point of the uterus. There is no effective means for detecting or predicting the weakest point of the uterus. Rapid recognition is key to the treatment of uterine rupture.


Subject(s)
Uterine Rupture , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Infant , Uterine Rupture/epidemiology , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Uterus
2.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 28(2): 125-128, 2024 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426295

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous uterine rupture before the onset of labour is rare in pregnancy especially before the third trimester. It is life threatening with devastating consequences to the mother and fetus. We report a case of spontaneous second trimester uterine rupture in a multipara with a previous uterine scar with the aim of creating awareness and sharing the challenges in diagnosis and management of this unusual complication of pregnancy. A 34-year-old woman with two previous deliveries presented at 16 weeks gestation with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding of one day duration. At presentation, she was pale and in shock. There was generalized abdominal tenderness with guarding and rebound tenderness. At laparotomy, there was uterine rupture involving the lower segment with right lateral upward extension which was repaired. She remained stable at the follow up visit. In conclusion, Spontaneous uterine rupture of a previous caesarean section scar in the second trimester is rare. The diagnosis should be considered in a woman with previous caesarean section who experience an acute abdomen in the second trimester of pregnancy.


La rupture utérine spontanée avant le début du travail est rare pendant la grossesse, surtout avant le troisième trimestre. Elle met la vie en danger et entraîne des conséquences dévastatrices pour la mère et le fœtus. Nous rapportons un cas de rupture utérine spontanée au deuxième trimestre chez une multipare présentant une cicatrice utérine antérieure dans le but de sensibiliser et de partager les défis du diagnostic et de la prise en charge de cette complication inhabituelle de la grossesse. Une femme de 34 ans ayant déjà accouché deux fois s'est présentée à 16 semaines de gestation avec des douleurs abdominales et des saignements vaginaux d'une durée d'un jour. Lors de la présentation, elle était pâle et sous le choc. Il y avait une sensibilité abdominale généralisée avec une sensibilité de garde et de rebond. Lors de la laparotomie, il y a eu une rupture utérine impliquant le segment inférieur avec extension latérale droite vers le haut qui a été réparée. Elle est restée stable lors de la visite de suivi. En conclusion, la rupture utérine spontanée d'une cicatrice de césarienne antérieure au deuxième trimestre est rare. Le diagnostic doit être envisagé chez une femme ayant déjà subi une césarienne et présentant un abdomen aigu au cours du deuxième trimestre de la grossesse.


Subject(s)
Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/complications , Cicatrix/surgery
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(11): e37445, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489687

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Uterine rupture is an obstetrical emergency associated with severe maternal and fetal mortality. It is rare in the unscarred uterus of a primipara. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 25-year-old woman in her 38th week of gestation presented with slight abdominal pain of sudden onset 10 hours before. An emergency cesarean section was done. After surgery, the patient and the infant survived. DIAGNOSES: With slight abdominal pain of clinical signs, ultrasound examination showed that the amniotic sac was found in the peritoneal cavity with a rupture of the uterine fundus. INTERVENTIONS: Uterine repair and right salpingectomy. OUTCOMES: After surgery, the patient and the infant survived. The newborn weighed 2600 g and had an Apgar score of 10 points per minute. Forty-two days after delivery, the uterus recovered well. LESSONS: Spontaneous uterine rupture should be considered in patients even without acute pain, regardless of gestational age, and pregnancy with abdominal cystic mass should consider the possibility of uterine rupture.


Subject(s)
Urogenital Abnormalities , Uterine Rupture , Uterus/abnormalities , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Adult , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Uterus/surgery , Rupture, Spontaneous/etiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(10): e37428, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457539

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Uterine rupture during pregnancy poses significant risks to both the fetus and the mother, resulting in high mortality and morbidity rates. While awareness of uterine rupture prevention after a cesarean section has increased, insufficient attention has been given to cases caused by pregnancy following hysteroscopy surgery. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report 2 cases here, both of whom had a history of hysteroscopy surgery and presented with severe abdominal pain during pregnancy. DIAGNOSES: Both patients had small uterine ruptures, with no significant abnormalities detected on ultrasonography. The diagnosis was confirmed by a CT scan, which showed hemoperitoneum. INTERVENTIONS: We performed emergency surgeries for the 2 cases. OUTCOMES: We repaired the uterus in 2 patients during the operation. Both patients recovered well. The children survived. No abnormalities were detected during their follow-up visits. LESSONS: Attention should be paid to the cases of pregnancy after hysteroscopy.


Subject(s)
Uterine Rupture , Child , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Hysteroscopy/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Uterus/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(10): e37071, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457586

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Uterine rupture is extremely hazardous to both mothers and infants. Diagnosing silent uterine rupture in pregnant women without uterine contractions is challenging due to the presence of nonspecific symptoms, signs, and laboratory indicators. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the elevated risks associated with silent uterine rupture. PATIENT CONCERNS: on admission, case 1 was at 37 gestational weeks, having undergo laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage 8 months prior to the in vitro fertilization embryo transfer procedure, case 2 was at 38 4/7 gestational weeks with a history of 5 previous artificial abortion and 2 previous vaginal deliveries, case 3 was at 37 6/7 gestational weeks with a history of laparoscopic myomectomy. DIAGNOSES: The diagnosis of silent uterine rupture was based on clinical findings from cesarean delivery or laparoscopic exploration. INTERVENTIONS: Case 1 underwent emergent cesarean delivery, revealing a 0.25 cm × 0.25 cm narrow concave area above the Ring Ties with active and bright amniotic fluid flowing from the tear. Case 2 underwent vaginal delivery, and on the 12th postpartum day, ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 5.8 cm × 3.3 cm × 2.3 cm lesion on the lower left posterior wall of the uterus, and 15th postpartum day, laparoscopic exploration confirmed the presence of an old rupture of uterus. Case 3 underwent elective cesarean delivery, revealing a 3.0 cm × 2.0 cm uterine rupture without active bleeding at the bottom of the uterus. OUTCOMES: The volumes of antenatal bleeding for the 3 patients were approximately 500 mL, 320 mL, and 400 mL, respectively. After silent uterine ruptures were detected, the uterine tear was routinely repaired. No maternal or neonatal complications were reported. LESSONS: Obstetricians should give particular consideration to the risk factors for silent uterine rupture, including a history of uterine surgery, such as laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage, laparoscopic myomectomy, and induced abortion.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Laparoscopy , Uterine Rupture , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Uterus , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects
6.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 52(4): 238-245, 2024 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373487

ABSTRACT

Between 2016 and 2018, 20 maternal deaths were related to obstetric haemorrhage, excluding haemorrhage in the first trimester of pregnancy, representing a mortality ratio of 0.87 per 100,000 live births (95% CI 0.5 -1.3). Obstetric haemorrhage is the cause of 7.4% of all maternal deaths up to 1 year, 10% of maternal deaths within 42days, and 21% of deaths directly related to pregnancy (direct causes). Between 2001 and 2018, maternal mortality from obstetric haemorrhage has been considerably reduced, from 2.2deaths per 100,000 live births in 2001-2003 to 0.87 in the period presented here. Nevertheless, obstetric haemorrhage is still one of the main direct causes of maternal death, and remains the cause with the highest proportion of deaths considered probably (53%) or possibly (42%) preventable according to the CNEMM's collegial assessment (see chapter 3). The preventable factors reported are related to inadequate content of care in 94% of cases and/or organisation of care in 44% of cases. In this triennium, maternal death due to haemorrhage occurred mainly in the context of caesarean delivery (65% of cases, i.e. 13/20), and mostly in the context of emergency care (12/13). The main causes of obstetric haemorrhage were uterine rupture (6/20) in unscarred uterus or in association with placenta accreta, and surgical injury during the caesarean delivery (5/20). Every maternity hospital, whatever its resources and/or technical facilities, must be able to plan any obstetric haemorrhage situation that threatens the mother's vital prognosis. Intraperitoneal occult haemorrhage following caesarean section and uterine rupture require immediate surgery with the help of skilled surgeon resources with early and appropriate administration of blood products.


Subject(s)
Maternal Death , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Maternal Mortality , Maternal Death/etiology , Cesarean Section , Uterine Rupture/surgery
7.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 5, 2024 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uterine rupture is a rare complication that can occur in the first trimester of pregnancy. It can lead to serious maternal morbidity or mortality, which is mostly due to catastrophic bleeding. First trimester uterine rupture is rare; hence, diagnosis can be challenging as it may be confused with other causes of early pregnancy bleeding such as an ectopic pregnancy. We present a case of first trimester scar dehiscence and conduct a literature review of this rare condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old African patient with four previous hysterotomy scars presented with severe lower abdominal pain at 11 weeks of gestation. She had two previous histories of third trimester uterine rupture in previous pregnancies with subsequent hysterotomies and repair. She underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy that confirmed the diagnosis of a 10 cm anterior wall uterine rupture. A laparotomy and repair of the rupture was subsequently done. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the case presented adds to the body of evidence of uterine scar dehiscence in the first trimester. The risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, and management outlined may help in early identification and management of this rare but life threatening condition.


Subject(s)
Uterine Rupture , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Adult , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Cicatrix , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Black People
9.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 292: 97-101, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992425

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report maternal and neonatal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in a series of women with a prior uterine rupture. METHODS: The records of all 103,542 deliveries (22,286 by cesarean section) performed in a single tertiary medical center from 2009 to 2021 were reviewed. Women with a prior uterine rupture, defined as a separation of the entire thickness of the uterine wall, with extrusion of fetal parts and intra-amniotic contents into the peritoneal cavity documented in the operative report of the previous cesarean delivery or laparotomy, were identified for inclusion in the study. RESULTS: The cohort included 38 women with 50 pregnancies (50 neonates). Women had been scheduled for elective cesarean delivery at early term. Mean gestational age at delivery was 36 + 4 weeks (±5 days). In 7 pregnancies (14 %), spontaneous labor occurred before the scheduled cesarean delivery (at 36 + 6, 35 + 4, 35 + 3, 34 + 6, 34 + 3, 32 + 6 and 31 + 0 gestational weeks). A recurrent uterine scar rupture was found in 4 pregnancies (8 %), and uterine scar dehiscence, in 2 pregnancies (4 %), all identified during elective repeat cesarean delivery. In none of these cases was there a clinical suspicion beforehand; all had good maternal and neonatal outcomes. One parturient with placenta previa-accreta had a planned cesarean hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Women with prior uterine rupture have good maternal and neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies when managed at a tertiary medical center, with planned elective term cesarean delivery, or even earlier, at the onset of spontaneous preterm labor.


Subject(s)
Placenta Accreta , Uterine Rupture , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Infant , Uterine Rupture/epidemiology , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome , Cicatrix , Uterus , Surgical Wound Dehiscence , Retrospective Studies
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(48): e36383, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Corneal pregnancy is rare and difficult to detect in the early stages. Due to the abundant blood supply in this area, a rupture can result in massive internal bleeding, shock, and even death. Therefore, immediate surgery is necessary, and patients must replenish their blood volume as soon as possible to ensure blood supply to important organs. For those whose blood pressure cannot immediately rise, surgery should be performed while resisting shock to buy time. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 34-year-old Chinese woman at 19 weeks of gestation who had a corneal pregnancy. No abnormalities were detected in the examinations in the first trimester. This patient was 19 weeks pregnant and sought medical advice due to sudden lower abdominal pain, syncope, and hemorrhagic shock. After rescue and treatment, she recovered and was discharged from the hospital, afterwards, the patient gave birth to a child 7 years later. CONCLUSION: The early diagnosis of cornual pregnancy is mainly based on ultrasound. However, there is a high incidence of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of this disease. Patients may face serious and life-threatening conditions in case of the rupture of cornual pregnancy. This disease can be mainly treated by surgery.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Cornual , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Child , Humans , Adult , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Hemorrhage/complications , Abdominal Pain , Ultrasonography/adverse effects
11.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(12)2023 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086577

ABSTRACT

Uterine rupture is a rare obstetric emergency that is typically associated with the presence of scar tissue such as in the case of previous caesarean section. In this case report, a primigravid patient presented to the hospital in cardiac arrest with massive haemoperitoneum secondary to a posterior uterine rupture. The histological specimen was found to have diffuse adenomyosis at the site of rupture. On review of the literature, there is insufficient evidence to suggest we as clinicians should alter the antenatal care for patients with known adenomyosis; however, this case highlights how we should have a high index of suspicion for those presenting with signs and symptoms of uterine rupture with known adenomyosis in the absence of other risk factors.


Subject(s)
Adenomyosis , Uterine Rupture , Female , Humans , Adenomyosis/complications , Risk Factors , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterus/pathology , Pregnancy
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(49): e36254, 2023 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065862

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Uterine rupture (UR) during pregnancy is a serious obstetric complication. Here we report a case of spontaneous rupture in an unscarred uterus at 13 weeks of gestation after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, which is not common in past references. Our focus is to understand the relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and UR. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 33-year-old infertile woman with a history of SLE became pregnant after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. She presented with sudden mental fatigue and dyspnea, accompanied by sweating, dizziness and lower abdominal pain at 13 weeks of gestation. DIAGNOSES: Blood analysis revealed anemia. Ultrasonography and plain computed tomography scan revealed intrauterine early pregnancy with effusion in pelvic and abdominal cavity. Laparotomy confirmed the diagnosis of UR. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent emergency laparotomy. Upon surgery, multiple myometrium was weak with only serosal layer visible, and there was a 2.5 cm irregular breach with exposed placenta and villous tissue in the posterior wall of the uterus. After removing intrauterine fetus and repairing the breach, there was still persistent intraperitoneal hemorrhage. The patient underwent subtotal hysterectomy finally. OUTCOMES: Postoperative recovery was uneventful. The patient was discharged on the 8th day after operation. LESSONS: Combined efforts of specialists from ultrasound, imaging and gynecologist led to the successful diagnosis and management of this patient. We should be cautious about the occurrence of unscarred uterus rupture during pregnancy of the women with the disease of SLE and long-term glucocorticoid treatment. In IVF, we had better transfer one embryo for these patients with the history of SLE. Obstetricians should strengthen labor tests to detect early signs of UR of the patients with SLE and long term glucocorticoid treatment. Once UR is suspected, prompt surgical treatment is needed as soon as possible.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Uterine Rupture , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Rupture, Spontaneous/complications , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Uterine Rupture/epidemiology , Uterus
13.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 185(43)2023 Oct 23.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37921111

ABSTRACT

This case report describes a uterine rupture initially misinterpreted as acute appendicitis. Uterine rupture is a rare but serious obstetric complication, whereas acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of abdominal pain. The patient gave vaginal birth after previously having had a caesarean delivery. The following days she experienced persistent abdominal pain which was interpreted as acute appendicitis. Diagnostic laparoscopy found a normal appendix but a complete uterine rupture. The lesson to be learned from this case report is not to let the most common diagnoses overshadow the rare ones.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Appendix , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/surgery , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Postpartum Period
14.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 291: 141-147, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37871351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the reproductive outcomes of women who underwent abdominal repair surgery for cesarean scar defect (CSD). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study performed in a tertiary center. We retrospectively reviewed 20 women who underwent abdominal repair between 2007 and 2021. The indication for the repair was a minimal residual myometrial thickness (RMT) of ≦3.0 mm. We investigated surgical complications, changes in minimal RMT before and three-months after the repair, and reproductive outcomes. RESULTS: The median age at the time of repair was 36 years (27-40), with a median body mass index of 21.0 (17.7-28.7) and a median of 1 prior cesarean section (1-5). Twelve women reported secondary infertility, while eight women were concerned about the potential risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies due to thin RMT. Additionally, one woman had a co-existing vesicouterine fistula, two had abscess and hematoma formation at the precedent cesarean section, and three showed remarkable dehiscence of the defect. The median minimal RMT significantly increased to 5.05 mm (range; 2.5-14.2 mm) after the repair. Seven women had a total of eight live births, with a median duration from the repair to a live-birth pregnancy of 11.5 months (range; 4-20 months). No surgical complications occurred during the repair, and there were no instances of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. However, one woman who became pregnant with twins following double blastocyst transfer required a cesarean section at 25 weeks of pregnancy due to bulging towards the bladder side of the repaired CSD. CONCLUSION: Abdominal repair for CSD is feasible in women with thin RMT who experience secondary infertility. Twin pregnancies can promote thinning of the CSD repair site, potentially increasing the risk of uterine rupture.


Subject(s)
Infertility , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Cicatrix/complications , Cicatrix/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery
15.
Pathologica ; 115(4): 232-236, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37711040

ABSTRACT

The main risk for uterine rupture is the presence of a uterine scar due to prior cesarean delivery or other uterine surgery. However, rupture in an unscarred uterus is extremely rare, and risk factors include multiple gestations, trauma, congenital anomalies, use of uterotonics and placenta accreta spectrum.Placenta accreta spectrum, also known as morbidly adherent placenta, is becoming increasingly common and is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.We report a case of unscarred uterine rupture due to placenta percreta in a multiparous woman that required emergency peripartum hysterectomy.


Subject(s)
Placenta Accreta , Uterine Rupture , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Placenta Accreta/surgery , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Hysterectomy , Pelvis , Risk Factors
16.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 500, 2023 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37420177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinically silent uterine rupture with complete fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity is an extremely rare complication. Diagnosis can be difficult and the risk to the mother and fetus is high. Conservative management has been described only in a few cases of partial expulsion of the fetus so far. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 43-year-old tercigravida with a history of previous laparotomic myomectomy and subsequent cesarean section. The subsequent pregnancy was complicated by uterine wall loosening and rupture at the site of the previous uterine scar after myomectomy and complete fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity. The diagnosis was made at 24 + 6 weeks of gestation. Considering the absence of clinical symptomatology and the good condition of the fetus, a conservative approach was chosen with intensive monitoring of the maternal and fetal conditions. The pregnancy ended by elective cesarean section and hysterectomy at 28 + 0 weeks of gestation. The postpartum course was uneventful and the newborn was discharged to home care 63 days after delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity after silent uterine rupture of the scarred uterus may be accompanied by minimal symptomatology making early diagnosis difficult. This rare complication must be considered in the differential diagnosis in women after major uterine surgery. In selected cases and under conditions of intensive maternal and fetal monitoring, conservative management may be chosen to reduce the risks associated with prematurity.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Cavity , Uterine Rupture , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Uterus
17.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 507, 2023 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434108

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intestinal obstruction is an uncommon non-obstetric condition during pregnancy which may cause maternal and fetal mortality. Clinicians are confronted with challenges in diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction due to the overlapping symptoms, concerns over radiological evaluation, and surgical risks. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a 39-year old, gravida 7, para 2, woman who suffered from acute intestinal obstruction at 34 weeks of gestation. Ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography were applied for intestinal obstruction diagnose. Conservative treatment was initially attempted. But following ultrasound found the absence of fluid in the amniotic sac and the patient showed no improvement in clinical symptoms. An emergency caesarean section was then performed. Intra-operative assessment showed dense adhesion between the left wall of uterus and omentum, descending colon, and sigmoid colon. After adhesion dialysis, uterine rupture with complete opening of the uterine wall at the site of left uterine cornua was found without active bleeding. The uterine rupture was then repaired. CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon during pregnancy, clinical suspicion of bowel obstruction is necessary especially in women with a history of abdominal surgery. Surgical intervention is indicated when conservative therapy fails and when there are signs of abnormal fetal conditions and worsened symptoms.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Obstruction , Uterine Perforation , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Uterine Perforation/complications , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Cesarean Section , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Uterus
18.
West Afr J Med ; 40(7): 730-735, 2023 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uterine rupture is an obstetric emergency associated with significant maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity, especially in resource-constraint countries such as Nigeria. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and feto-maternal outcome of uterine rupture in a Nigerian teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all cases of uterine rupture managed over 21 years. The case notes of all affected women were retrieved, and information on sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics, clinical presentation, intraoperative findings, and fetal and maternal outcomes were extracted. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 and descriptive statistics were computed. Factors associated with maternal deaths secondary to rupture of the gravid uterus were determined using binary logistic regression analyses. Statistical significance was reported at P<0.05. RESULTS: There were 31,616 deliveries during the review period, out of which were 182 cases of uterine rupture giving an incidence of 5.76 per 1,000 deliveries. Most of the cases of uterine rupture (65.2%) were treated by uterine repair. Maternal and fetal deaths were recorded in 8.1% and 82.7% of cases respectively. Women aged at least 35 years (P=0.035), women who had laboured at home or traditional birth attendant's (TBA) place (P=0.002), women who had multiple sites rupture (P=0.049) and those who developed hypovolemic shock (P=0.002) were more likely to die from uterine rupture. CONCLUSION: Ruptured uterus remains a significant cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in Nigeria. Strategies for prevention include effective health education of the masses, the conduct of labour in a well-equipped health facility, and prompt referral of at-risk women.


CONTEXTE: La rupture utérine est une urgence obstétrique associée à une mortalité et une morbidité maternelles et périnatales significatives, en particulier dans les pays à ressources limitées comme le Nigeria. OBJECTIF: Déterminer l'incidence et l'issue fœto-maternelle de la rupture utérine dans un hôpital universitaire nigérian. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective de tous les cas de rupture utérine pris en charge sur une période de 21 ans. Les notes de cas de toutes les femmes concernées ont été récupérées et des informations sur les caractéristiques sociodémographiques et obstétriques, la présentation clinique, les résultats peropératoires et les issues fœtales et maternelles ont été extraites. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide de la version 23.0 de SPSS et des statistiques descriptives ont été calculées. Les facteurs associés aux décès maternels consécutifs à la rupture de l'utérus gravide ont été déterminés à l'aide d'analyses de régression logistique binaire. La signification statistique a été rapportée à P<0,05. RÉSULTATS: Il y a eu 31 616 accouchements pendant la période examinée, dont 182 cas de rupture utérine, soit une incidence de 5,76 pour 1 000 accouchements. La plupart des cas de rupture utérine (65,2 %) ont été traités par réparation utérine. Les décès maternels et fœtaux ont été enregistrés dans 8,1% et 82,7% des cas respectivement. Les femmes âgées d'au moins 35 ans (P=0,035), les femmes ayant accouché à domicile ou chez une accoucheuse traditionnelle (P=0,002), les femmes ayant eu des ruptures multiples (P=0,049) et celles ayant développé un choc hypovolémique (P=0,002) étaient plus susceptibles de mourir d'une rupture utérine. CONCLUSION: La rupture de l'utérus reste une cause importante de morbidité et de mortalité maternelles et périnatales au Nigeria. Les stratégies de prévention comprennent une éducation sanitaire efficace des masses, la conduite du travail dans un établissement de santé bien équipé et l'orientation rapide des femmes à risque. Mots-clés: Rupture utérine, Lagos, Mortalité maternelle, Mortalité périnatale, Incidence, Ligature tubaire bilatérale.


Subject(s)
Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uterine Rupture/epidemiology , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Nigeria/epidemiology , Universities , Hospitals, Teaching , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Uterus
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(24): e33977, 2023 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37327264

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: In most cases, uterine rupture occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy or during labor. Even fewer reports have been published about the occurrence of this condition without a gynecologic history of any surgical procedure. Due to their scarcity and variable clinical presentation, early diagnosis of uterine rupture may be difficult, and if the diagnosis is not timely, the condition may be life-threatening. PATIENT CONCERNS: Herein, 3 cases of uterine rupture from a single institution are described. Three patients are at different gestational weeks and all have no history of uterine surgery. They came to the hospital due to acute abdominal pain, which is characterized by severe and persistent pain in the abdomen, with no apparent vaginal bleeding. DIAGNOSES: All 3 patients were diagnosed with uterine rupture during the operation. INTERVENTIONS: One patient underwent uterine repair surgery; while the other 2 underwent subtotal hysterectomy due to persistent bleeding and pathological examination after surgery confirmed placenta implantation. OUTCOMES: The patients recovered well after the operation, and no discomfort occurred in the follow-up. LESSONS: Acute abdominal pain during pregnancy can pose both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. It is important to consider the possibility of uterine rupture, even in cases where there is no history of prior uterine surgery. The key to the treatment of uterine rupture is to shorten the diagnosis time as much as possible, this potential complication should be carefully monitored for and promptly addressed to ensure the best possible outcomes for both the mother and the developing fetus.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute , Uterine Rupture , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Uterine Rupture/diagnosis , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Uterine Rupture/surgery , Rupture, Spontaneous/surgery , Rupture, Spontaneous/etiology , Uterus/surgery , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/surgery , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/etiology , Abdomen, Acute/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...